Given that Cameron must have been fully aware of:
- Maria Miller’s expenses ‘anomalies’ when he appointed her as Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport,
- the UN’s gay marriage, press freedom curtailment and freedom of speech curtailment diktats when he took office,
- the likelihood that the public would be vehemently against all such moves from the UN,
… why did Cameron put a known expenses fiddler in charge of policies which he knew would cause volcanic political eruptions?
Could it be that Maria Miller’s dodgy expenses made her more pliable and keener to effect these monumental changes to our constitution and society, against the public will?
Why won’t he sack her, when he must be fully aware that nearly 80% of the public are disgusted and want her gone from office?
Perhaps he fears that he would be henceforth unable to persuade other self-soiled MPs to do his dirty bidding? Or maybe he wants to defuse the Miller time bomb before he allows her to become an aggrieved back-bencher?
We need to vet our MPs very thoroughly indeed – and throw out ALL troughers at the 2015 GE.
PS: While Cameron appears to be somewhat rowing back from his support of Maria Miller, I don’t expect justice from the man who has brought this country to the point where tyranny of government can have free reign.
Lest we forget, Glenn Greenwald’s recent lecture on civil liberties, free speech and freedom of the press reminds us of what is at stake.
As an aside, I’m pleased to see that Charles Moore has been reading up on the New World Order. Welcome to the club of the awake, Mr Moore.